Inasmuch as every government is an artificial person, an abstraction, and a creature of the mind only, a government can interface only with other artificial persons. The imaginary, having neither actuality nor substance, is foreclosed from creating and attaining parity with the tangible. The legal manifestation of this is that no government, as well as any [government] law, agency, aspect, court, etc. can concern itself with anything other than corporate, artificial persons and the contracts between them.” [PENHALLOW v. DOANE’S ADMINISTRATORS ] … “A separation from worldly objects,…” … “… Made or contrived by art” ..” Feigned, fictitious; not genuine or natural

PERSON, n. per’sn. [L. persona; said to be compounded of per, through or by, and sonus, sound; a Latin word signifying primarily a mask used by actors on the state.]

“state” probably should be “stage” bt I love the Freudian Slip ;)

Clearfield Trust Co. v. United States 318 U.S. 363-371 1942:
“Governments descend to the level of a mere private corporation, and take on the characteristics of a mere private citizen . . . where private corporate commercial paper and securities is concerned.

A Little Knowledge is Dangerous

You can’t expect to wield supreme executive power just because some watery tart threw a sword at you!

Ei nihil turpe, cui nihil satis

“A man’s mind may be likened to a garden, which may be intelligently cultivated or allowed to run wild; but whether cultivated or neglected, it must, and will, bring forth. If no useful seeds are put into it, then an abundance of useless weed seeds will fall therein, and will continue to produce their kind.”

Par inparem imperium non habet.An equal has no power over an equal.

So, the U.S. Forest Service, under the guise of a governmental entity wants to contract.

I wonder if the Muggles know that they are a corporation listed on Dun & Bradstreet ( A credit rating company for corporations).

USDA FOREST SERVICE “Also TRADED as “US Forest Service” …Head quarters in DC…

“It is a fact that a student can graduate from this, the fourth largest law school in the United States, without ever having written a pleading, a contract, a will, a promissory note or a deed. It’s worse than that. It is a fact that most students graduate from this law school without ever having seen a real honest-to-God pleading, or contract, will, promissory note or deed. A student can graduate without ever having set foot in a courtroom and without ever having spoken to, or on behalf of, a person in need of advice or counsel. A student can graduate without once being exposed to the operation of the rules of court. It is a fact that such students and those similarly trained at most other schools do pass the bar exam and are certified as competent to render advice and to represent others in court. Whatever else may be said about this license issued by the state bar, let it be said that for these students and their clients it is a cruel hoax. Law professors are not appalled by these facts mainly because they are products of the same type of education.” James R. Nielsen, My Turn: The Flaw in Our Law Schools, Newsweek, June 11, 1984 Newsweek, June 11, 1984.
If you think that’s bad, consider the duties of an attorney IF you do hire one:

CJS Vol 7 Sec 4“…NOT TO THE CLIENT…” !

CJS 7  2 and 3


Oh, hell no you won’t. You fucked that up….

Refuse = Dishonor

Black’s 3rd , 1933
OFFER, ‘V. To bring to or before ; to present for acceptance or rejection; to hold out or proffer; to make a proposal to; to
exhibit something that may be taken or received or not. Morrison v. Springer, 15 Iowa, 346 ; Vincent v. Woodland Oil Co., 165 Pa.02,.’ 30 A. 991 ; People V. Ah Fook, 62 Cal. 494.
The word “offer,” as used in. a statute providing that the buyer, to rescind a sale, must offer within’ a reasonable time to return the goods, is synonymous with the word “tender.” Collins v. Skillings, 224 Mass. 275, 112 N. E. 938, 939, Ann. Cas. 1918D, 424.

ACCEPTANCE. The taking and receiving of anything in good part. and as it were a tacit agreement to a preceding act, which might have ,been defeated or avoided if such acceptance had not been made. Brooke, Abr.
The act of a person to whom a thing is offered or tendered by another. whereby he receives the thing with the intention of retaining it, such intention [being evidenced by a sufficient act.

Bouvier’s A Dictionary Of Law, Vol II, Pg 421
In some cases, a neglect to perform a duty which the party is required by law or his agreement to do will amount to a refusal.

Black’s 3rd 1933
REFUSAL. The act of one who has, by law, a right and power of having or doing something of advantage, and declines it. Also, the declination of a request or demand, or the omission to comply with ‘ some requirement of law, as the result of a positive intention to disobey. In the latter sense, the word is often coupled with “neglect,” as if a party shall “neglect or refuse” to pay a tax, file an official bond, obey an order of court, etc. But “neglect” signifies a mere omission of a duty, which may happen through. inattention, dilatoriness, mistake, ‘ or inability to perform, while “refusal” implies the positive denial of an application or command, or at least a ‘mental determination not to’ comply.

Webster’s 1928

ESTOP’PEL, n. In law, a stop; a plea in bar, grounded on a man’s own act or deed, which estops or precludes him from averring any thing to the contrary.

ESTOP’, v.t. In law, to impede or bar, by one’s own act.

A man shall always be estopped by his own deed, or not permitted to aver or prove any thing in contradiction to what he has once solemnly avowed.,dishonor

  • To refuse or decline to accept or pay; — said of a bill, check, note, or draft which is due or presented; as, to dishonor a bill exchange.”

“To treat with indignity.”

“any action towards another which manifests contempt for him; contumely; incivility or injury, accompanied with insult”

Webster’s 1828 Agreement
Union of opinions or sentiments; as, a good agreement subsists among the members of the council.
Union of minds in regard to a transfer of interest; bargain; compact; contract; stipulation.

Webster’s 1828 Contract
1. An agreement or covenant between two or more persons, in which each party binds himself to do or forbear some act, and each acquires a right to what the other promises; a mutual promise upon lawful consideration or promise upon lawful consideration or cause, which binds the parties to a performance; a bargain; a compact. Contracts are executory or executed.

Webster’s 1828 Bind
To oblige by a promise, vow, stipulation, covenant, law, duty or any other moral tie; to engage.

Webster’s 1828 Oblige
To constrain by legal force; to bind in law.


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.