1987 / To the interviewer about the media in general “Why don’t you tell the public what’s really going on? Why don’t you tell them that the water is so bad that the fish can’t live in it? Why don’t you tell them that the polar caps are melting because of this …”machine”?”
4:50 Interviewer “Who’s destroying the Earth and why?” Answer “Human beings that are accepted and called ‘right’. 100 Years ago we could cut down trees and afford an exuberant lifestyle. We can’t afford that no more. We’re running out of atmosphere – we’re running out of water. Pretty soon it’ll be so polluted that we won’t be able to drink it. The United States is OWNED by foreign corporations.”
“Go out and demonstrate about a nuclear power plant and then go home and turn the power on. If you want to demonstrate for nuclear power plant don’t use electricity. Does that make sense? They want to demonstrate for something and get their faces up in the camera like ‘look at me’ and you know… ‘pay me to be somebody’ and then on the other hand they can’t be somebody because they go home and turn the electricity on and use the same fuckin pollution… you dig what I’m saying? You can’t protest cutting down trees with paperwork. All the people that wanna live, stop cutting down trees and stop polluting the ground.
I don’t consider them “drugs” They are more or less religiously significant, awareness – mind expanding apparatuses that come from the intelligence universe .”
“We’re all our own prisoners. We’re all our on wardens. We all do our own time. We get stuck in our own little trips and we judge ourselves on what we do. There’s only one person to be scared of – That’s yourself.”
Black’s 4th Pg 763
FIRST OF EXCHANGE. Where a set of bills of
exchange is drawn in duplicate or triplicate, for
greater safety in their transmission, all being of
the same tenor, and the intention being that the
exceptance [sic*] and payment of any one of them
(the first to arrive safely) shall cancel the others
of the set, they are called individually the “first of
exchange,” “second of exchange,” etc. See Bank
of Pittsburgh v. Neal, 22 How. 96, 110, 16 L.Ed.
- * I think Hank mad a mistake here. I conferred with Noah & we agree … “acceptance”
This is a typical list of commercial maxims. They seem to be copied & re-pasted mindlessly.Can you decide for yourself that each one is true? Or do you believe gurus?
“Because there are three classes of intellects: one which comprehends by itself; another which appreciates what others comprehend; and a third which neither comprehends by itself nor by the showing of others; the first is the most excellent, the second is good, the third is useless.”
A QUICK STUDY OF COMMERCIAL LAW
Commercial Maxims (Basic Rules)
- A workman is worthy of his hire.
Legal maxim: It is against equity for freemen not to have the free disposal of their own property.
- All are equal under the Law.
Legal maxim: No one is above the law.
- In Commerce truth is sovereign.
Legal maxim: to lie is to go against the mind.
- Truth is expressed by means of an affidavit.
Legal maxim: (none)
- An unrebutted affidavit stands as the truth in Commerce.
Legal maxim: He who does not deny, admits.
- An unrebutted affidavit becomes the judgment in Commerce.
Legal maxim: (none . . . concept of the duel without weapons)
- A matter be expressed to be resolved.
Legal maxim: He who fails to assert his rights has none.
- He who leaves the field of battle first loses by default.
Legal maxim: He who does not repel a wrong when he can, occasions it.
- Sacrifice is the measure of credibility.
Legal maxim: He who bears the burden ought also to derive the benefit.
- A lien or claim can be satisfied only through rebuttal by Counter affidavit point-for-point, resolution by jury, or payment
Legal maxim: If the plaintiff does not prove his case, the defendant is absolved.