https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/5/552a

(13) the term “Federal personnel” means officers and employees of the Government of the United States, members of the uniformed services (including members of the Reserve Components), individuals entitled to receive immediate or deferred retirement benefits under any retirement program of the Government of the United States (including survivor benefits).

That line is worth repeating: “…individuals entitled to receive immediate or deferred retirement benefits under any retirement program of the Government of the United States …”

So, with a SSN, one is viewed as “Personnel”. Personnel do what they are TOLD TO DO. Sit down, shut up, fold your hands. They may also be told how many chickens are to be in their yard, if they can collect rain water, how to comply to th building code, how fast to drive, exact stops at particular signs.
As a matter of fact, a traffic light has better judgment and higher standing than a “citizen”.

What is a “citizen”? It’s self-defining in the XIV Amendment: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States…”
Here’s an example of “self-defining” terms that will not be this way in any dictionary: ” https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/31″

“The privilege against self-incrimination is neither accorded to the passive resistant, nor the person who is ignorant of his rights, nor to one indifferent thereto. It is a fighting clause. Its benefits can be retained only by sustained combat. It can not be retained by attorney or solicitor. It is valid only when insisted upon by a belligerent claimant in person. The one who is persuaded by honeyed words or moral suasion to testify or produce documents rather than make a last ditch stand, simply loses the protection. Once he testifies to part, he has waived his right and must on cross examination or otherwise, testify as to the whole transaction. He must refuse to answer or produce, and test the matter in contempt proceedings, or by habeas corpus”. –US v Johnson, 76 F. Supp 538, 540 (1947).
Ya gotta have balls & they gotta be your own.

A Treatise on the Law of Master and Servant: https://books.google.com/books?id=qrYzAQAAMAAJ&pg=PR34&dq=%22Law+of+Master+and+Servant%22+Wilson&hl=en&sa=X&ei=Su_1VNeEBMiDoQSq-gI&ved=0CC8Q6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=%22Law%20of%20Master%20and%20Servant%22%20Wilson&f=false
The Law of Master and Servant: Being a Treatise: https://books.google.com/books?id=Xb4zAAAAIAAJ&pg=PR71&dq=%22Law+of+Master+and+Servant%22+Wilson&hl=en&sa=X&ei=Su_1VNeEBMiDoQSq-gI&ved=0CDUQ6AEwAg#v=onepage&q=%22Law%20of%20Master%20and%20Servant%22%20Wilson&f=false

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/5/552a
http://www.msn.com/en-us/money/retirement/how-big-a-role-should-social-security-play-in-your-retirement/ar-BBibhjN

Alleged wealthy man assigned a Public Defender. Why would the Court go to such “expense”?
Public Defenders have a 94% LOSS rate. That’s right. 6% of the time, as a national average, the defendant wins.
So, if this guy is really a target, then he’ll be assigned a PD for a more certain conviction.

http://www.seattlepi.com/local/article/Piles-of-cash-bunches-of-bling-and-a-public-6021422.php#photo-7398237

The standard of journalistic sophistication, abstract thought and grammar is between the 7th and the 9th grade. News papers, magazines and TV and other media are designed to comport with the FOG index, or more technically precise, the “Gunning-Fog Index”.
This index is billed as a “readability standard” whereby the intent is to be understood and readable by the largest number of people.
The reality is that no event or idea can be promulgated in any efficient, mass scale beyond the range of the ever-dropping standard of roughly the 8th grade.
There’s more to know on the subject of “discernment” But knowing this data point is a start.
http://gunning-fog-index.com/index.html

1) https://archive.org/details/practicalrhetori00quacuoft
2) https://archive.org/details/freshmanrhetoric00slat
3) https://archive.org/details/everydayrhetori00doddgoog

Penhallow V Doane’s
Inasmuch as every government is an artificial person, an abstraction, and a creature of the mind only, a government can interface only with other artificial persons. The imaginary, having neither actuality nor substance, is foreclosed from creating and attaining parity with the tangible. The legal manifestation of this is that no government, as well as any [government] law, agency, aspect, court, etc. can concern itself with anything other than corporate, artificial persons and the contracts between them.”
[ PENHALLOW v. DOANE’S ADMINISTRATORS ]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P2lSDetRrNk

http://1828.mshaffer.com/d/word/real

#4 Relating to things, not to persons; [ So, if “not” is removed, logically, it would transfer to real; “not real = persons”] https://archive.org/details/logi00clar

http://1828.mshaffer.com/d/word/abstraction … “A separation from worldly objects,…”

http://1828.mshaffer.com/d/word/artificial … “… Made or contrived by art” ..” Feigned, fictitious; not genuine or natural

http://1828.mshaffer.com/d/word/person
PERSON
, n. per’sn. [L. persona; said to be compounded of per, through or by, and sonus, sound; a Latin word signifying primarily a mask used by actors on the state.]

“state” probably should be “stage” but I love the Freudian Slip ;)

Clearfield Trust Co. v. United States 318 U.S. 363-371 1942:
“Governments descend to the level of a mere private corporation, and take on the characteristics of a mere private citizen . . . where private corporate commercial paper and securities is concerned.

Penhallow V Doane’s

A Little Knowledge is Dangerous

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.