Are you Federal Personnel?

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/5/552a

(13) the term “Federal personnel” means officers and employees of the Government of the United States, members of the uniformed services (including members of the Reserve Components), individuals entitled to receive immediate or deferred retirement benefits under any retirement program of the Government of the United States (including survivor benefits).

That line is worth repeating: “…individuals entitled to receive immediate or deferred retirement benefits under any retirement program of the Government of the United States …”

So, with a SSN, one is viewed as “Personnel”. Personnel do what they are TOLD TO DO. Sit down, shut up, fold your hands. They may also be told how many chickens are to be in their yard, if they can collect rain water, how to comply to th building code, how fast to drive, exact stops at particular signs.
As a matter of fact, a traffic light has better judgment and higher standing than a “citizen”.

What is a “citizen”? It’s self-defining in the XIV Amendment: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States…”
Here’s an example of “self-defining” terms that will not be this way in any dictionary: ” https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/31″

“The privilege against self-incrimination is neither accorded to the passive resistant, nor the person who is ignorant of his rights, nor to one indifferent thereto. It is a fighting clause. Its benefits can be retained only by sustained combat. It can not be retained by attorney or solicitor. It is valid only when insisted upon by a belligerent claimant in person. The one who is persuaded by honeyed words or moral suasion to testify or produce documents rather than make a last ditch stand, simply loses the protection. Once he testifies to part, he has waived his right and must on cross examination or otherwise, testify as to the whole transaction. He must refuse to answer or produce, and test the matter in contempt proceedings, or by habeas corpus”. –US v Johnson, 76 F. Supp 538, 540 (1947).
Ya gotta have balls & they gotta be your own.

A Treatise on the Law of Master and Servant: https://books.google.com/books?id=qrYzAQAAMAAJ&pg=PR34&dq=%22Law+of+Master+and+Servant%22+Wilson&hl=en&sa=X&ei=Su_1VNeEBMiDoQSq-gI&ved=0CC8Q6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=%22Law%20of%20Master%20and%20Servant%22%20Wilson&f=false
The Law of Master and Servant: Being a Treatise: https://books.google.com/books?id=Xb4zAAAAIAAJ&pg=PR71&dq=%22Law+of+Master+and+Servant%22+Wilson&hl=en&sa=X&ei=Su_1VNeEBMiDoQSq-gI&ved=0CDUQ6AEwAg#v=onepage&q=%22Law%20of%20Master%20and%20Servant%22%20Wilson&f=false

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/5/552a
http://www.msn.com/en-us/money/retirement/how-big-a-role-should-social-security-play-in-your-retirement/ar-BBibhjN

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s